I Just Found 15 Autumn Buys From 2019's Coolest Collab—and They're All Under £60

Sponsor Content Created With Nasty Gal

Everyone now and then a high-street edit comes along that ticks all the boxes: it's trend-led, affordable and versatile. This August, the accolade goes to influencer Josefine HJ's collaboration with Nasty Gal. Comprised of a refined 30-piece edit, this collection is just what we want to be wearing during the tricky transeasonal period. Hello, long-sleeved dresses, midi skirts, patent trenches and tailored trousers.

nasty-gal-josefine-hj-fashion-edit-282138-1566982746624-image

(Image credit: Nasty Gal)

We love how Josefine has styled the patent minidress with a chunky chain necklace. 

nasty-gal-josefine-hj-fashion-edit-282138-1566982744674-image

(Image credit: Nasty Gal)

We want everything in (faux) leather this season. White and tan are a particular match made in heaven.

Coming in autumn-ready colourways of khaki, black, white and brown, this is an edit that can easily be worn together, and chopped and changed to create a variety of cool ensembles. I personally have my eye on the vinyl belted trench, which will look so good over my summer dresses as well as with denim. The wrap jumper is also a winning buy and will give any outfit some much-needed Rosie HW polish (just add high-waisted trousers and a chunky gold necklace).

Best of all, every single item comes in under £100, which is good news for our bank balances. However, this also means these pieces won't stick around for long, so make sure you snap up your faves before other people do! Do we have you convinced yet? Well, we'll let the collection speak for itself—scroll down to see the pieces we want to add to our baskets today.

nasty-gal-josefine-hj-fashion-edit-282138-1566982746125-image

(Image credit: Nasty Gal)

Got a big event coming up? Forgo a floaty dress in favour of a kick-ass tuxedo mini. 

Scroll down to see and shop our edit of Josefine HJ's Nasty Gal collaboration. 

Shop Our Josefine H.J x Nasty Gal Edit

Explore More: